Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Parks director says Mount Airy Forest 'not ideal' for mountain biking

Mount Airy Forest is too environmentally sensitive and not ideal for a mountain bike trail pilot project, according to a recent report to Cincinnati City Council by Cincinnati Parks Director Willie F. Carden, Jr.

The report comes a month after Council adopted a motion directing Cincinnati Parks to work with the Cincinnati Off Road Alliance (CORA) and other volunteers to develop up to 20 miles of trails in the western portion of the 1,459-acre park, west of Interstate 74.

Instead, Carden said that the Park Board has proposed a pilot project in West Price Hill's Miles Edwards Park, which has less sensitive soils, slopes, and plant and animal communities.

In 2001, a consultant studying the plant communities of Mount Airy Forest found a wide variety of wildflower habitat including rare plants such as ginseng green dragon and goldenseal. Other wildflowers such as black cohosh, trout lily, trillium and dutchmen's breeches were also in abundance.

Soils within the park are comprised of Ava, Eden, Pate, and Switzerland, all of which are highly erodible, Carden said.

"Because of these weaknesses, many of the soils are moist almost year round and not conducive to trail riding, no matter how trails may be built," Carden said.


Diverging ideas

The Park Board's view on mountain biking trails in City parks was outlined in June 2010 in a report to Council, by Carden, in which he said that empirical evidence suggested that the trails caused environmental damage, lead to crime and vandalism, and were far too costly given the City's budget constraints.

In August 2010, Council's Livable Communities Committee directed Cincinnati Parks to work with a by-then committed group of biking enthusiasts to design and build a trail somewhere in the City.

The Park Board selected Miles Edwards Park.

"The Park Board never heard back from CORA but apparently CORA proceeded to develop a trail proposal for Mt. Airy Forest and presented this directly to City Council," Carden said.

In November 2010, CORA submitted a full proposal for the Mount Airy Forest Backcountry Trails, which would begin with a 7.5-mile loop for various skill levels, designed and constructed to sustainable, International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA) standards.


Damage a concern

Carden maintains that other park users, from hikers to horseback riders to environmentalists, oppose mountain biking in City parks.

The Park Board continues to view mountain biking as an activity that could damage the parks and would be "an inappropriate use", he said.

"Research in the field is somewhat contradictory as there is evidence of resource damage due to mountain biking even on appropriately built trails, as well as studies claiming this not to be the case," Carden said. "There is no question, however, that some people do not observe rules about when to ride and that people will also ride off of mountain bike trails and in restricted areas, and this causes damage."

CORA has pledged to build and maintain the trails, but Carden remains unsure about its ability to do so.

"Park staff visited trails that CORA maintains at East Fork, Mitchell, and Caesars Creek and found examples of poor maintenance such as washed out culverts, severe erosion, injured trees and vegetation, litter, and failure to abide by signage," Carden said.

Carden said that is appears that riders are using wet trails and creating new trails where the existing trail is not challenging enough.

"And this all occurs at these trails which CORA built and maintains," Carden said.


Pilot project conditional

CORA has also offered to identify donations and grants to install signs, trailhead features, barricades, and other capital improvements, which it has done at other parks.

"However, if they were to do this at Miles Edwards Park, or any other city park site, there would be no Park Board staff available to inspect the work or to assure it met appropriate standards," Carden said. "Furthermore, enforcement of trail riding rules would be problematic."

But Carden did say that the Park Board would be willing to work with CORA on a pilot project at Miles Edwards Park, given several conditions.

CORA would be required to develop timetables for construction; have firm volunteer commitments for trail construction, maintenance, and public education; and show a commitment to meet with the West Price Hill and Delhi Township communities on issues arising from trail construction.

"If CORA steps up to take on this task they would be asked to first address the community council and neighbors before Parks would allow the project to proceed," Carden said. "CORA would also be asked to commit to construction, maintenance and enforcement in a memorandum of understanding with the Park Board."

Previous reading on BC:
Mountain bike trail coming to Mount Airy Forest (2/21/11)
Cincinnati may get mountain bike trails after all (8/17/10)
Mountain bikers expected to advocate before council committee (8/2/10)
Mount Washington resident questions mountain biking research (7/7/10)
Mountain biking not coming to Cincinnati parks (6/15/10)

13 comments:

Jacob said...

This is ridiculous. Interstate 74 runs directly through Mt. Airy Forest. No doubt the exhaust and noise scares if not kills off any "delicate" stuff that might take up residence in the park. A mountain bike trail in this little-used section of the park won't do one millionth the damage that I-74 has.

Quimbob said...

I can go along with Carden on most of his criteria but crime, other than maybe littering, I don't see traditional crime as a potential problem.

Anonymous said...

what is this mans problem with trails? I'm about to offer to buy him a bike so he can educate himself. His resistance is quite annoying at this point. Dawn from Hartwell

Quimbob said...

FWIW, Mt A F turns 100 this year.
HT to The Cincinnati Asylum.

Anonymous said...

And horse back riding causes less erosion and is more environmentally sound than mountain biking? And serves a larger segment of the population? or maybe just the wealtheir segment of the population that has more clout.

Caesar Creek trails and parts of East Fork lake trails existed long before IMBA trail standards were developed. If the Park board was serious in evaluating this proposal they would look at Brown County and Versailles state parks in Indiana and the Alum Creek trails in Columbus and make an honest evaluation.

Joe said...

I favor keeping this portion of Mt Airy Forest a passive park. We must keep this area for hikers.

Anonymous said...

Leave it narrow minded people to cast dark clouds on good ideas. There are so many reasons why MTB trails in Mt.Airy makes sense and so many ways to make it successful. Mt.airy is an under utilized asset and I'm not talking about this "other side of I-74" part. Venture into the woods (on existing trails) on any given day in Mt.Airy and you'll find very few, if any, people. Forget all the BS studies, gov't red tape and excuses. Here's one simple idea that's cost effective and potentially even money making. Open existing trails to mountain bikes Sun, Tues & Thurs. then sell passes for $25/yr. I think there's plenty of riders out there that would be happy to pay to ride Mt.Airy legally.

By the way, horses do MUCH more damage to trails than a bike.

w.munzel said...

There are solutions to the technical issues Parks is grasping at- such as routing a trail around a wildflower area...but this is more about how the City of Cincinnati perceives itself and how it wants to grow- or at least stop losing population- as we move forward.

Are we close minded about new ideas and creative solutions as Parks is suggesting or are we optimistic and ready to implement a vision as city council has outlined in their motion.

The city lost 30,000 people in the last 10 years and is now less than 300,000 population. We need to do things to not only keep people here, but attract them. Providing mountain biking trails as an amenity for city residents in an underutilized park is one small step in the right direction.

If we don't do something new and creative as a city, there won't be anybody living in the city to actually visit the parks as people continue to move away.

Chad Irey said...

A body of empirical, scientific evidence now indicates that off-road cycling is no more damaging than other forms of recreation, including hiking. Thus, managers who prohibit bicycle use (while allowing hiking or equestrian use) based on impacts to trails, soils, wildlife, or vegetation are acting without sound, scientific backing. Trail design, construction, and maintenance may be much more important factors in controlling erosion than excluding specific user groups.

Kevin LeMaster said...

^^^ Anonymous, I think you're right. Deer far outnumber people, even around the parking lots and trail heads.

Kevin LeMaster said...

^^^^^ Anonymous, I think they visited East Fork and Caesars Creek not because of IMBA standards, but because they're trails that CORA maintains.

Kevin LeMaster said...

Chad, I would implore you to share this data with Parks. They will read it. I think they have reservations about how committed CORA is...show them how committed you guys are.

Anonymous said...

Couple of good reads that cut through the Cinci Parks' narrow views:

http://www.americantrails.org/resources/ManageMaintain/SprungImpacts.html

http://www.wildlandscpr.org/ecological-impacts-mountain-biking-critical-literature-review

Newer Post Older Post Home

Recent Comments